Join me for my presentation “Addicted to Meaning: How Good Technical Communication is Like Bad Magic Tricks” at tekom/tcworld in Wiesbaden on Tue 23 Oct at 1:45 pm.
In the session, I will explore how “meaning” works in technical communication, why it sometimes fails and how you can improve its chance for success. Being meaningful in your work is harder to measure than being correct, concise or consistent. However, it is just as essential: Understanding how and why communication is meaningful to your readers can help you to make your documentation more effective and to distinguish good from bad.
Using examples from topic-based authoring and minimalism, I will illustrate the underlying working of semiotics and mental models to show:
- Why minimalism works, but FAQ’s don’t
- Why asking a friend is effective, even when he doesn’t know the answer
- How readers create meaning from documentation
- … and how good documentation is like bad magic tricks
I will put our familiar tech comm tool box into a new context, so you can get a deeper understanding and a fresh perspective on tech comm and how it fits into the bigger picture of meaningful communication.
I’ve set up the topic in two earlier posts which give you an idea how I’ll tackle the issue: